Public institutions face a unique trilemma: deliver AI-driven services, stay compliant with the EU AI Act, and keep data under European sovereignty — all while navigating procurement rules designed for a pre-AI era. I've advised government agencies on AI strategy and built compliance frameworks aligned with EU regulations. I know the difference between AI that looks good in a press release and AI that survives a public-sector audit.
Engagement-based advisory and implementation for ministries, agencies, municipalities, and public institutions. No per-seat SaaS pricing — scoped programs tied to your mandate, budget cycle, and regulatory calendar.
Two weeks. A written readiness report ranked by severity, plus a 90-day roadmap you can actually defend to your board
Four weeks to a strategy document, a business case, an ROI model, and a 12-month execution plan — reconciled end to end and defensible to the board, the CFO, and your head of engineering
Eight weeks. A fine-tuned open-weight model — Llama 3, Mistral, or Qwen — that outperforms GPT-4 and Claude on your vertical while running on infrastructure you control
Sixteen weeks to AI running on the edge — inside a factory, a vehicle, a substation, or a sovereign infrastructure site — with the safety evidence, the SRE handoff, and the integration your operations team will accept
Twelve to twenty-four weeks to risk-classify your AI systems, complete the conformity assessment, produce the Annex IV technical documentation, and stand up post-market monitoring — before an enforcement deadline finds you unprepared
Part-time executive AI leadership — six to twelve months, two days a week — owning the AI P&L, governing risk, reporting to the board, and coaching the team you will eventually promote into the seat