Your team is debating whether you need a coach or a consultant. The real answer? Neither. You need someone who understands that 70% of AI projects fail because of people, not technology—and can deliver both strategic execution AND leadership transformation.
You've read that most AI failures are people problems, not technology problems. But consultants just deliver strategy decks—they don't transform how leaders think.
Your team needs to own the AI strategy, not just receive one. But coaches don't build production systems.
Traditional consultants deliver answers. But your organization needs the capability to keep making good decisions after they leave.
You're tired of the 'consultant paradox': they create dependency while claiming to build capability.
I don't do pure coaching or pure consulting. Every engagement combines both—because fixing AI requires fixing both the strategy and the people who execute it.
Using First Principles Thinking and Socratic Questioning—not to give answers, but to help you discover the right questions. Your strategy, owned by you.
Build production AI systems using proven methodology. RAG pipelines, LLMOps infrastructure, agent orchestration. No PowerPoint AI.
Train your team using the methodology that built Auralink (1M+ lines in 2 months). You become self-sufficient—or you didn't get value.
Brené Brown's framework: Boundaries, Reliability, Accountability, Vault, Integrity, Non-judgment, Generosity. Trust isn't assumed—it's built through action.
I blend ICF/EMCC-accredited coaching techniques with 15 years of production AI experience. You get both the clarity and the capability.
You're a leadership team that knows AI failure is usually a people problem, not a technology problem. You want both strategic clarity AND hands-on delivery. You value capability transfer over dependency. You're ready for honest feedback—not just validation.
Consulting delivers answers: 'Here's your AI strategy.' Coaching develops your ability to find answers: 'What assumptions are you making? What would need to be true for this to work?' Most firms do one or the other. I do both—because fixing AI requires fixing both the strategy and how leaders think about strategy.
Three mechanisms: (1) Every deliverable includes the 'why' and methodology—not just the 'what', (2) Your team shadows every technical decision and learns the frameworks, (3) Success criteria includes your team's ability to execute independently. If you still need me after the engagement ends, I didn't do my job.
Yes, but most clients realize mid-engagement that they need both. Pure strategy without execution capability creates shelf-ware. Pure execution without strategic thinking creates technical debt. The hybrid model exists because that's what actually works in AI transformation.
First Principles = breaking problems down to fundamental truths, then reasoning up from there. Example: Instead of 'We need ChatGPT for customer service' (copying competitors), ask: 'What problem are we actually solving? What's the simplest solution? Do we even need AI?' Most AI failures start with the wrong question. First Principles forces the right question.
BRAVING (Brené Brown): Boundaries, Reliability, Accountability, Vault, Integrity, Non-judgment, Generosity. I use it to build trust with clients—not through personality, but through consistent action. Example: 'Vault' means what you share in confidence stays in confidence. 'Non-judgment' means I'll challenge your strategy without judging you personally. Trust enables honest feedback, which is where transformation happens.
Leadership coaches develop soft skills—how to communicate, manage teams, build culture. That's valuable, but it doesn't ship AI systems. I coach on strategic decision-making AND deliver production systems. You get both the mindset shift and the technical results. It's leadership coaching for technical transformation.
Feed Forward (Marshall Goldsmith): Instead of analyzing past mistakes ('Your last AI pilot failed because...'), we focus on future actions ('Next time, try X and Y'). Why? Because you can't change the past, but you can change the future. It's psychologically safer, more actionable, and doesn't trigger defensiveness. Especially useful when past AI initiatives have failed—no point dwelling on the wreckage.
Yes. In fact, most of my clients are CEOs, COOs, or business unit leaders—not CTOs. I translate technical complexity into strategic clarity. The coaching side helps you ask the right questions of your technical team. The consulting side ensures those questions lead to production systems, not more pilots.
Resistance usually means one of three things: (1) They've been burned by consultants before—we address that through transparency and early capability transfer, (2) They feel judged—we use Feed Forward instead of feedback, focusing on future actions not past failures, (3) They don't trust the process—we build trust through BRAVING, demonstrating reliability through small commitments before asking for big ones. Resistance is data, not a blocker.
Both. Startups need coaching on strategic decisions ('Should we build or buy?') and hands-on help shipping the first system. Enterprises need coaching on organizational alignment and consulting on scaling production systems. The engagement scope adjusts, but the hybrid model works at any scale—because people problems and technical problems exist everywhere.
Ontdek andere diensten die dit aanbod aanvullen
Laten we bespreken hoe deze dienst uw specifieke uitdagingen kan aanpakken en echte resultaten kan leveren.