Executive Product Leadership for Physical AI
Fractional CPO
Recurring senior product and portfolio ownership when a full-time executive is not yet the right shape. The cadence is agreed in days per month and reviewed at written checkpoints.
EXECUTIVE PRODUCT LEADERSHIP
Fractional CPO or Interim Head of Product.
Give your product function clear priorities and day-to-day leadership. I take on the agreed product leadership responsibilities and decision rights. Your company retains authority beyond that role.
The role at a glance
- Is this for us?
- You need senior product leadership without making a permanent hire now.
- What do we receive?
- A written mandate with decision rights, product priorities and roadmap, a decision log, and a transition plan naming the next owner.
- What is the commitment?
The role is deliberately non-permanent. Days per month, decision rights and the working cadence are agreed in writing before the role begins. A written checkpoint decides whether to renew, revise, hand over or stop.
From approximately €8,000/month, depending on scope and operating intensity — the engagement is shaped to your portfolio
The mandate names a single executive sponsor, an initial operating horizon, a days-per-month cadence and an explicit authority boundary.
- What must our team provide?
- An executive sponsor, written decision rights and agreed access to your people, systems and budget.
- Can we inspect the output?
No. No sample of this role’s output is published. Read the Fractional CPO and Interim Head of Product role references and the evidence register.
- What does it not include?
- Hyperion is not a staffing or engineering-delivery bench. Hiring and employment decisions, and regulatory, contractual and certification accountability, stay with your organisation.
Scope, process and responsibilities
When Executive Product Leadership is the right instrument
Several product, platform or AI initiatives run at once, or a temporary leadership gap leaves a founder or CTO arbitrating product decisions on top of another job.
- Product decisions queue behind an executive who cannot reach them, and teams pick a direction by default.
- Each initiative applies its own standard for what counts as ready, so nothing is comparable at portfolio level.
- No one person is accountable for connecting product, architecture, safety, field operations and economics across the portfolio.
Agree the role before I begin.
You and I agree which decisions I can take, what the role covers and how it ends. I then work with your leaders and team on priorities, the roadmap and day-to-day product decisions. The written mandate sets the working cadence, escalation path and handover.
What running without an accountable product owner costs
A portfolio without an owner does not fail loudly. It drifts: initiatives outlive their evidence, commitments are made per project, and the permanent hire that would fix it is postponed one more quarter while the same decisions wait.
- Initiatives continue past the point where the evidence stopped supporting them, because nobody owns the stop decision.
- Architecture and vendor commitments are made project by project and become expensive to reconcile later.
- Standards, gates and escalation paths are re-invented per team, so nothing accumulates into an operating system.
Fractional and interim leadership are two modes of one mandate.
Both sit inside Executive Product Leadership. The difference is the trigger, cadence and exit—not a fourth engagement family.
Executive Product Leadership for Physical AI
Interim Head of Product
Time-bounded product leadership through a vacancy, leave, reorganisation or permanent search. Stabilisation and successor handover are designed into the mandate from day one.
Decision rights, sponsor and boundary
The mandate is written before the role begins: one named executive sponsor, an explicit decision-rights and escalation matrix, an agreed operating cadence, the team interfaces the role works through, and the conditions under which it ends. What the mandate excludes is stated as plainly as what it includes — everything in the right-hand column stays with your organisation.
Hyperion owns (included in the mandate)
- Portfolio prioritisation and one production bar applied consistently across initiatives
- The Product Bridge Contract from strategy and funding to development missions, and from technical and field evidence back to portfolio commitments
- Product, system, software, data and AI architecture decisions inside the written decision rights
- Production-gate reviews, build-versus-buy and vendor recommendations, and AI governance and operational-risk review
- The decision log, roadmap coherence, and the executive and quarterly operating reviews
- The transition plan: developing the internal successor and running the handover that ends the mandate
The client owns (excluded from the mandate)
- One named executive sponsor with the authority to confirm or overrule a portfolio decision
- The delivery teams, the systems and the budget — Hyperion leads decisions, it does not supply a bench
- The team interfaces the role works through: engineering, data, safety, field operations and commercial
- Hiring and employment decisions, including appointing the internal successor the mandate develops
- Regulatory, contractual and certification accountability
The operating mandate
The exact portfolio is scoped, but every mandate makes authority, cadence, records and capability transfer explicit.
- Written sponsor, decision-rights and escalation matrix
- Product Bridge Contract connecting portfolio intent, development missions and field evidence
- Portfolio prioritisation across product, platform and AI initiatives
- Production-gate reviews
- Product, system, software, data and AI architecture decisions
- Vendor and build-versus-buy evaluation
- AI governance and operational-risk review
- Decision log, roadmap and cross-program consistency
- Incident learning and product feedback
- Fit-for-context Scrum, Kanban, scaled-delivery and systems-engineering boundaries
- Organisational transformation across funding, product, teams, technology, governance and capability
- Product organisation, hiring and internal successor plan
- Executive and quarterly operating reviews
How the engagement works
- First 30 days — establish authorityMap the portfolio, decision debt and stakeholders; agree the product bar, governance, sponsor access and decision rights. The operating measures are agreed in writing with the sponsor.
- Days 31–60 — install the cadenceConnect portfolio, product, team, integration and field cadences; select the minimum useful delivery methods; run gate, architecture and vendor decisions into inspectable records.
- Days 61–90 — prove the systemReview portfolio flow, product-development evidence, risks and ownership with the sponsor; adjust priorities, remove operating bottlenecks and test internal handover readiness.
- Renew, revise, hand over or stopAt each agreed checkpoint, continue with a revised mandate, transfer ownership to the internal successor or close the engagement cleanly.
What you receive
The mandate leaves behind an operating record, not a slide pack: artefacts your organisation continues to use after the role ends.
- A written mandate: sponsor, decision rights, escalation path, cadence, team interfaces and stop conditions
- A Product Bridge Contract and multi-cadence operating model for portfolio, product, team, integration and field decisions
- A prioritised portfolio view with one production bar and comparable gate status per initiative
- A decision log recording each consequential call, its evidence and the alternatives rejected
- Production-gate readouts, architecture and vendor recommendations, and AI governance and operational-risk records
- A transition plan naming the internal successor, the capability gaps to close and the exit conditions
Cadence, term and exit
The role is deliberately non-permanent. Fractional CPO ownership recurs at an agreed cadence; Interim Head of Product leadership runs through a bounded transition. Both end through a written checkpoint and handover.
- Days per month, working rhythm, sponsor access and response boundaries are agreed in writing before the role begins
- An initial operating horizon with a written checkpoint to renew, revise, hand over or stop
- A transition plan runs from the first checkpoint: the internal successor is named and developed, not discovered at the end
- The start date and the cadence are confirmed in the proposal against the founder's available days
What shapes the engagement
The mandate names a single executive sponsor, an initial operating horizon, a days-per-month cadence and an explicit authority boundary. Scope then depends on:
- Number and maturity of product, platform and AI initiatives
- Cadence and time commitment required
- Governance and regulatory context
- Degree of decision authority
- Whether delivery teams are in place or need building
- Executive and board involvement
- Internal successor and exit conditions
Pricing and terms
- Scoped engagement — defined together after a fit call
- Days per month, working rhythm, sponsor access and response boundaries are agreed up front
- From approximately €8,000/month, depending on scope and operating intensity — the engagement is shaped to your portfolio
- A written checkpoint decides whether to renew, revise, hand over or stop
- You may stop the mandate at any time by written notice: fees are owed up to the stop date only, prorated on the service days set in the proposal or, failing that, on working days, and expenses already committed with your agreement that cannot be cancelled remain owed; if the founder cannot continue for more than ten consecutive working days, or in a way that makes an agreed date impossible to keep, you may suspend or end the mandate immediately and fees paid in advance for work not performed are refunded within 30 days of the end of the engagement (Terms of Sale, section 11)
- The monthly fee covers Hyperion's work only: your teams' time, delivery capacity, hardware, licences and hosting, and any specialist safety, security or legal review are budgeted separately. Travel for on-site work is invoiced separately unless it is included in the fee
Fit
A good fit when
- Several product, platform or AI initiatives compete for the same executive attention
- A sponsor can grant written decision rights and will be available at the agreed cadence
- The organisation wants a consistent production bar more than another advisory report
- There is an intent to build internal product leadership, and a successor to develop
Not a fit when
- One consequential decision is the whole problem — a Product Decision Review is cheaper and faster
- The expectation is engineering delivery capacity; Hyperion is not a staffing or engineering-delivery bench
- Decision rights cannot be granted, so the role would advise without authority
- A permanent executive is already available to start and no interim bridge or recurring fractional ownership is needed
Relevant evidence
The judgement behind this mandate rests on a founder career record and Hyperion-authored research references. Each is labelled with what it does and does not prove; modelled and simulated work is labelled as such and is never presented as a client outcome.
Review the evidenceEvery engagement is led directly by Mohammed Cherifi. Specialist partners may be introduced for clearly defined work when required and disclosed; Hyperion is not a staffing or engineering-delivery bench.
FAQ
- Which leadership mode fits?
- Choose Fractional CPO for recurring product and portfolio ownership, or Interim Head of Product for a time-bounded leadership gap and successor handover. The mandate defines decision rights, sponsor access, capacity, cadence and exit in writing.
- How much time does it involve?
- Days per month, working rhythm, sponsor access and response boundaries are agreed in writing. The first checkpoint tests whether that cadence is enough for the portfolio; it is revised rather than quietly overloaded.
- Do you replace our team?
- No. The role is to raise and hold the production bar and build your team's capability — not to become a permanent dependency.
- Can the mandate lead an agile or product operating-model transformation?
- Yes, when the transformation is tied to product and portfolio decisions. The mandate can reshape funding, decision rights, product boundaries, team interfaces, delivery flow, technical governance and capability transfer. Scrum, Kanban, SAFe or other practices are selected from context and kept inside their actual definitions; installing ceremonies is not treated as a transformation outcome.
- Does the role require AI in the portfolio?
- No. The role owns product and portfolio decisions for physical products, software-defined platforms and industrial AI. A portfolio with no AI in it qualifies. Where AI is proposed, it is weighed against the non-AI alternative like any other investment.
Running several product, platform or AI initiatives?
Tell me what you want to achieve, what is blocking progress and when you need help. A few sentences are enough.
Discuss your project
No sales funnel