Skip to content
Hyperion Consulting
  • Product System
  • Capabilities
  • Industries
  • Engagements
  • Decision Lab
  • About
Discuss your product
Discuss your product
Hyperion Consulting logo - Physical AI and industrial AI consulting

Decision engineering for Physical AI — full-cycle product leadership and architecture across solution, system, software, data and AI.

Services

  • Product System
  • Industries
  • Engagements
  • Product Decision Review
  • Product Leadership Program
  • Product Operating Partner
  • Discuss your product

Company

  • Capabilities
  • Decision Lab
  • Evidence
  • Insights
  • About
  • Delivery & Trust
  • Resources
  • Contact

Industries

Primary market

  • Manufacturing
  • Automotive & mobility
  • Energy & infrastructure

Adjacent sector

  • Logistics & fleets
  • Agrifood robotics
  • Maritime operations
  • Urban systems
  • Defence & dual-use
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseTerms of SaleLegal NoticeAccessibilityData Subject RequestEU Online Dispute Resolution (opens in a new tab)Newsletter
(opens in a new tab)(opens in a new tab)(opens in a new tab)(opens in a new tab)(opens in a new tab)
◆Forbes Technology Council Member Leader — Tech Consulting Group(opens in a new tab)◆French Government AI Ambassador for Industry — Osez l’IA Initiative(opens in a new tab)◆FranceNum Activateur(opens in a new tab)
© 2026 Hyperion Consulting.
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France

PHYSICAL AI PRODUCT LEADERSHIP PROGRAM

Lead one Physical AI product to its next evidence-backed milestone.

A milestone-scoped mandate for one Physical AI product, one named evidence gate and one acceptance bar. Hyperion leads the product and architecture decisions, coordinates the critical-path work and leaves your team with the evidence, operating artefacts and ownership needed for the next commitment.

Scope a Product Leadership Program

Start with a 30-minute, no-obligation fit call.

Cross one evidence gate — deliberately.

This is not an open-ended transformation programme or a menu of technical services. The mandate begins with the current product state, the next evidence-backed milestone and the conditions that close it. A prior Product Decision Review can supply that baseline, but an equivalent evidence pack is accepted.

Baseline mandate and selectable workstreams

Every Program owns the gate, decision log, evidence plan and handover. Technical workstreams are selected only when they sit on that product's critical path.

  • Named milestone, acceptance bar and evidence plan
  • Product and system boundary with explicit decision rights
  • Prioritised critical path, decision log and risk register
  • Evidence pack, 90-day commitments and executive gate readout
  • Operational ownership, documentation and capability handover
  • Production architecture and edge/embedded runtime
  • Data and sensing readiness
  • Model integration and evaluation
  • OT/IT integration
  • Resilience and failure-mode analysis
  • Safety, cybersecurity, governance and human authority
  • Controlled launch, observability and incident readiness

How the program runs

  1. 01
    Name the gateConfirm the product and system boundary, the milestone, the acceptance bar, decision rights and the evidence required to close it.
  2. 02
    Lead the critical pathResolve the prioritised product, architecture, integration, reliability and governance work against the agreed acceptance bar.
  3. 03
    Prove the milestoneAssemble and review the evidence. Where the gate is launch, prepare a controlled rollout with monitoring, recovery and incident ownership.
  4. 04
    Decide & hand overRun the executive gate readout, record the decision and transfer the artefacts, capability and next commitments to your team.

What shapes the scope

The minimum useful unit is one product, one evidence gate and one acceptance bar. Duration and quote depend on:

  • Number of use cases and sites
  • Hardware and OT integration complexity
  • Data readiness
  • Safety implications and regulatory classification
  • Existing architecture
  • On-site requirements and specialist involvement
  • How much delivery ownership you want us to carry
  • Timeline

Pricing and terms

  • Scoped quote — defined after a fit call and a reviewed evidence baseline
  • Milestone-based delivery against agreed acceptance criteria
  • A 90-day action plan or production checkpoint is part of the work — not a guarantee of production in 90 days
  • No universal results or fixed duration are promised

Where this sits

Use a Product Decision Review when one consequential decision still needs independent resolution. Use this Program when the direction is sufficiently clear and one evidence gate needs accountable leadership. Use the Product Operating Partner when that ownership must recur across a portfolio. Each mandate can stand alone; a prior review fee can be credited toward a qualifying Program.

FAQ

Do we need a Product Decision Review first?
Not automatically. The Program needs a credible evidence baseline, named blockers and acceptance criteria. A Product Decision Review can establish them; if you already have an equivalent evidence pack, we scope from that.
Do you guarantee production in 90 days?
No. We plan against a 90-day horizon and define production checkpoints, but real systems carry real risk. We are explicit about what is and is not within our control.
Who owns the system at the end?
You do. Capability transfer and operational handover — documentation, runbooks, and the knowledge to run and evolve the system — are part of the program, not an afterthought.

Is the direction clear, but the next gate still unowned?

Bring the product, current evidence and next commitment to a 30-minute fit call. We will tell you whether a bounded Program fits — or whether the decision itself must be resolved first.

Scope a Product Leadership Program

30-minute, no-obligation fit call.