Skip to content

Decision Lab · current proof and applied research

Where Physical AI product decisions become inspectable.

Run the fictional product flight simulator, inspect Auralink, Reachy and bench evidence, and use methods that turn observations into product decisions. The planned physical Foundry has its own clearly labelled reference.

An inspectable evidence register linking claims to classifications, sources and decision records.
Current Decision Lab index — evidence remains classified by maturity, source and limitation.

Digital lab live · physical Foundry planned

The product flight simulator and Hyperion-authored research artefacts are available now. The six model-backed exhibits are switched off until each has the same controls as the Product Council. The proposed physical facility, zones and missions remain illustrative until built, tested and labelled otherwise.

Read an experiment as a bounded piece of evidence

A possible decision sequence
  1. Identify the question and setup

  2. Inspect the artefact and observed result

  3. Check limits before applying it

Use this decision path to frame the scope. The links below let you inspect the work and discuss a relevant engagement.

Available now

Explore one product decision.

The simulator is the Lab’s only runnable product experiment. Its scenario and outputs are fictional, illustrative and experiment-only.

Fictional · illustrative · experiment-only

Physical AI Product Flight Simulator

Configure a fictional AMR, drone, cobot or vehicle-feature product. Stress economics, reliability, completeness, recovery and operator burden; inspect the diagnostic gaps; then export Product Decision, Product Bridge and Product System records with provenance. All outputs remain illustrative and experiment-only.

Fly a product decision

Owned research

Inspect the question, artefact and current status.

Each record states what was examined and what the evidence does and does not establish.

Auralink

Auralink

Question
How should charging infrastructure coordinate bounded AI decisions across edge, station and network?
Artefact
Public reference architecture, technical preprint and evidence dossier.
Current status
Public Physical AI research · documented by Hyperion. An inspectable research reference—not a client deployment or commercial-outcome claim.
Inspect Auralink

Reachy Mini + SO-101

Reachy Mini + SO-101

Question
What survives from simulated and dry-run robot behaviour when product and operator constraints are explicit?
Artefact
Measured, simulated and dry-run research notes for Reachy Mini + SO-101.
Current status
Measured · simulated · dry-run. Real sensing and teleoperation evidence stays separate from simulated autonomy and unexecuted robot actions.
Inspect the robotics evidence

Edge-model evaluation

Question
What can an open-weight inference bench support without overstating throughput?
Artefact
Field notes that withdraw the unsubstantiated token-rate figures.

Current status

The current field-note revision is awaiting editorial review. Its link and dependent performance figures are withheld; no throughput or product-readiness conclusion is offered.

Go deeper

Explore the research archive and future Lab.

Follow the research projects behind the work, or explore the proposed physical lab.

Research and venture archive

Inspect the full set of Hyperion research ventures, their maturity labels and their source material.

Open the archive

Planned · illustrative until commissioned

The Decision Foundry

Explore the proposed stations, missions and evidence approach for a future physical lab.

Open the planned Foundry

Bring one stuck initiative

Leave with the next decision.

In a 30-minute fit call, Mohammed will identify the decision, the missing evidence and whether one of Hyperion’s three mandates is appropriate—or say plainly that it is not.

30 minutes · no obligation · Mohammed leads every conversation