Product & investment intelligence
TransformationOS
Connect transformation priorities to governed delivery missions.
Strategy, operating-model choices, approvals and delivery evidence are disconnected across teams.
Transformation sponsors and portfolio leaders
Demonstration platform
- Context
- Fictional transformation scenario
- Proposal
- A bounded mission and its dependencies
- Authority
- Named approval with explicit limits
- Handover
- Evidence, refusals and unresolved decisions
Explore the reasoning
Choose a fictional or authorised operating-model decision and its context.
- Engage now
- A mission review connecting context, approval boundaries, delivery dependencies and evidence ownership.
- Inspect
- Demonstration platform
- Four fictional demo-company datasets spanning automotive, finance, health, and industrial logistics.
- Still to validate
- Demo metrics, economics, scores, statuses and residual named-company fixtures are simulated and must not be read as customer evidence.
- Validate identity, isolation, authorised connector paths, recovery, and calibrated decision models in a real permitted organisational context.
Source reviewed
The decision behind the system
How does a strategic choice become an accountable mission?
A demonstration platform for portfolio, operating-model and delivery decisions, with adaptive mission workflows and fictional company scenarios.
TransformationOS explores governed organisational missions. LaunchpadOS structures product judgement; E2A maintains consulting-engagement continuity.
Adaptive delivery
Method packs, deterministic context assessment and composition support the definition of governed missions.
Human approval
Bounded, expiring authority and read/draft/create/request tool surfaces keep approval decisions with people.
Evidence-aware missions
Import and refusal records connect evidence to portfolio, workflow and mission decisions.
Read the complete system walkthrough
Assess
Choose a fictional or authorised operating-model decision and its context.
Compose
Inspect the proposed mission, relevant methods and dependencies.
Approve
Keep the proposal, human approval and expiring authority explicit before any tool action.
Follow
Track evidence, refusals and handover. Demonstration economics are not customer results.
Inspect the source, test conditions and operating limits in the technical record.
Explore the technical record and evidence
Business ↔ technology bridge · Organisational transformation demonstrator
Make organisational transformation decisions traceable to product and technical reality.
Connects portfolio intent, product operating models, Agile@Scale, delivery evidence, and governance decisions.
This is a portfolio and source interpretation—not a customer, deployment, certification, or outcome claim.
- 01
Business pressure
Make/Buy, commonalisation, portfolio, funding, delivery, and operating-model decisions live in separate functions and dashboards.
- 02
Product decision
Represent decision rights, assumptions, approval states, evidence, cadence, and handover across the transformation portfolio.
- 03
Technical record
Tenant configuration, workflow modules, connector boundaries, retrieval, DORA and flow metrics, scenario records, proposal-first writes, approvals, and audit state.
- 04
Evidence return
Delivery friction, architecture duplication, supplier constraints, flow data, and field outcomes can return to investment, organisation, and portfolio choices.
Repository/runtime boundary
This page interprets source from a separate venture repository. Source presence does not make the venture a service running inside hyperion-consulting.io.
Visitor and client-data AI processing is restricted to Mistral through the governed EU endpoint. Owner-authorized Helio, Search and Product Council paths are enabled. A separate public-source editorial lane uses Anthropic with governed Mistral backup; it receives no website enquiries, client documents or visitor conversations. Deterministic tools remain available when remote AI is unavailable.
Source evidence
What the source actually establishes
A transformation-governance demonstration with fictional company scenarios and Adaptive Delivery mission workflows. Method packs, context assessment, bounded authority and human approvals connect portfolio decisions to evidence and delivery work.
- Maturity
- Demonstration platform
- Evidence review
- Source snapshot through
Architecture and product decisions
- Drive organisation, domain, KPI, connector, and theme variation through tenant configuration.
- Gate write actions behind proposal, approval, execution, and audit states.
- Route model requests by confidentiality while keeping connector and retrieval boundaries explicit.
Inspectable evidence
- Four fictional demo-company datasets spanning automotive, finance, health, and industrial logistics.
- Digest-verified method packs, deterministic context assessment, governed missions and evidence import/refusal records.
- Read/draft/create/request agent-tool boundaries, expiring authority and human-only approval paths alongside application verification records.
Claim boundary
- Demo metrics, economics, scores, statuses and residual named-company fixtures are simulated and must not be read as customer evidence.
- Connector names do not establish a live customer path. Tenant configuration controls presentation and defaults; it does not establish database, network or operational tenant isolation.
- No transformation result, enterprise deployment, calibrated recommendation, security certification or model-residency outcome is asserted.
Repository evidence is not client, deployment, certification, or outcome evidence.
Architecture
One deployment configuration. Eleven inspectable demo modules.
Three represented layers: deployment configuration, transformation-governance workflows, and model-assisted decision support. They expose assumptions and approval paths; they do not prove an enterprise outcome.
Source map only: a layer can represent implemented code, an adapter boundary, or documented design. It does not assert a configured production service.
- 01
Layer 1 — Tenant Configuration
A tenant.json controls branding, theme, enabled modules, portfolio and geography fields for a configured demo. A real deployment still requires identity, data, connector, isolation, migration and security engineering.
- 02
Layer 2 — 11 Transformation Modules
Make/Buy, commonalisation, portfolio, vendor, simulation, scaled-delivery, FinOps, obsolescence, OKR, M&A and executive-review surfaces share one configured demonstration model.
- 03
Layer 3 — AI Decision Engine
Model-assisted analysis can use configured catalogue, vendor and decision records to draft comparisons. Retrieved text and generated reasoning remain evidence inputs for a named human decision owner.
11 transformation modules
From Make/Buy to M&A — one tenant, one decision plane
The demonstration connects eleven workflow modules through one configuration, vendor inventory, decision log and model-routing boundary. Below is the behaviour represented in source, not a claim of deployed enterprise integration.
Repository surface only: availability, completeness, performance, and operational fitness require separate validation.
MOD 1Make/Buy Decision Intelligence
Structured decision support for build, buy or rent with scenario costs, vendor-fit fields and capability adjacency. The workflow records rationale and assumptions for later review.
MOD 2Solution Commonalization
Represents cross-division duplicate-solution comparison and merge-versus-keep scenarios. Any ROI value is an assumption-based model output, not realised savings.
MOD 3Portfolio Rationalization
Represents TIME-style application classification and strategic-fit fields with draft retire, replace, retain or rebuild recommendations. ServiceNow and Apptio are adapter boundaries, not verified live integrations.
MOD 4Vendor Governance
Represents vendor inventory, assumed spend, service-level, risk and renewal fields, plus draft negotiation-brief workflows over fictional demo records.
MOD 5Digital Twin Simulation
Compares declared process, organisation and platform scenarios before a governance decision. Outputs are modelled alternatives and narratives, not predictions of transformation impact.
MOD 6Agile@Scale Coaching
Represents SAFe-, LeSS- and team-topology-related facilitation views with context and maturity fields. It does not certify framework adoption or determine which operating model is effective.
MOD 7FinOps Dashboard
Represents cloud-cost attribution, anomaly and FinOps scorecard fields over demo inputs. Findings require connected billing sources and finance review before use.
MOD 8IT Obsolescence Tracking
Represents end-of-life and support-date records for inventoried components, with adapter points for advisories and draft migration planning. Coverage depends on configured sources.
MOD 9OKR Cascade
Drafts and compares strategic objectives, cascades and check-in signals. Alignment flags remain prompts for product and leadership review.
MOD 10M&A Integration Playbooks
Represents sector-oriented integration checklists, milestone tracking, assumption-based synergy scenarios and governance-cadence templates.
MOD 11Executive Dashboards
Role-oriented dashboards assemble module and demo data into review views. Their status is an input to leadership judgment, not an objective transformation verdict.
Tech Stack
Built With
Named technologies identify repository dependencies or adapter surfaces; they do not assert a live integration or deployment.
- Backend
- Python 3.12, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, SQLite (Postgres-ready), Redis, Celery, Pydantic v2
- AI / LLM
- Routing source for local, private and cloud model paths plus metadata-filtered retrieval; residency and fail-closed behaviour depend on explicit configuration and verification
- Frontend
- React 18, TypeScript, Vite, Tailwind CSS, Apple-minimal design system, Recharts, Framer Motion
- Connectors
- Jira, GitHub, Confluence and Azure DevOps adapter surfaces plus demo/mock connectors; write behaviour remains proposal-first and configuration-dependent
- Infrastructure
- Docker Compose, Caddy reverse proxy, OIDC/Azure AD auth, RBAC, approval workflows, SHA-256 audit trail
- Testing
- Pytest (backend), Vitest + React Testing Library (frontend), demo scripts for each capability module
Technical documents & controlled source access
Source Code
Explore the Code
Repository access, evaluation scope and any reuse terms are agreed explicitly; this public page does not promise source access or a licence.
NDA Required
To access the source code, please sign our Non-Disclosure Agreement. This is a standard legal formality.
Work with Hyperion
Walk through a transformation mission
A mission review connecting context, approval boundaries, delivery dependencies and evidence ownership.
Bring a short description of your situation, constraints and decision. We agree the scope, responsibilities and quote before work begins.
Use in a facilitated product mission
Make the division of work explicit.
Demonstration platform
A mission with people, approvals and evidence.
For a technical founder
Turn a reviewed pilot decision into a work and authority map: name the engineering participants, dependencies, approval owner and evidence required at the next milestone. Missing delivery capacity stays visible.
For an existing product team
Use a facilitated workflow review to establish who prepares, checks and approves work. Evaluate the proposed workflow with the team and hand over the operating instructions to a named owner.
These are reference patterns for a scoped engagement. Live connectors, operational isolation and production execution require separate qualification. The current LaunchpadOS–TransformationOS handoff is local file exchange, not a unified production service.
Explore the Product Team Design Canvas