Inspect the source, test conditions and operating limits in the technical record.
Explore the technical record and evidence
Business ↔ technology bridge · Creative workflow experiment
Keep commercial and brand intent attached to generated assets.
Explores persistent brand context and provider-neutral orchestration across creative workflows.
This is a portfolio and source interpretation—not a customer, deployment, certification, or outcome claim.
01
Business pressure
Creative teams move between provider tools while project context, brand constraints, approvals, licensing, and asset lineage fragment.
02
Product decision
Keep client, campaign, and brand context outside individual model requests and separate the user workflow from provider routing and background work.
03
Technical record
Web, API, gateway, worker, mobile, presentation-add-in, project-context, provider-adapter, export, and selected test surfaces.
04
Evidence return
Provider availability, asset quality, cost, licensing, and reviewer decisions return to workflow, model choice, and campaign governance.
Repository/runtime boundary
This page interprets source from a separate venture repository. Source presence does not make the venture a service running inside hyperion-consulting.io.
Visitor and client-data AI processing is restricted to Mistral through the governed EU endpoint. Owner-authorized Helio, Search and Product Council paths are enabled. A separate public-source editorial lane uses Anthropic with governed Mistral backup; it receives no website enquiries, client documents or visitor conversations. Deterministic tools remain available when remote AI is unavailable.
Source evidence
What the source actually establishes
A multi-surface creative-workflow prototype with web, API, gateway, worker, mobile, and document-add-in packages. The repository shows routing and workflow structure; provider availability and output quality are configuration-dependent.
Maturity
Development prototype
Evidence review
Source snapshot through
Architecture and product decisions
Keep project and brand context outside individual generation requests so it can be reused across assets.
Separate the user experience, API, model gateway, and background work queues.
Fall back to explicit mock providers during development when live provider credentials are absent.
Inspectable evidence
A workspace manifest covering web, API, AI gateway, workers, mobile, and presentation-add-in surfaces.
Provider-routing and campaign-context source boundaries.
Selected API, component, and browser-flow tests plus architecture and container documentation.
Claim boundary
A provider or model listed in configuration is not evidence that every adapter is live or commercially available.
No comparative output-quality, latency, cost-saving, or customer-use result is asserted.
Export and generation paths still require provider, licensing, safety, and quality review per use case.
Repository evidence is not client, deployment, certification, or outcome evidence.
Three source boundaries: campaign organisation, medium-specific workflow surfaces, and a CreativeRouter abstraction over operator-configured provider adapters.
Source map only: a layer can represent implemented code, an adapter boundary, or documented design. It does not assert a configured production service.
01
Layer 1 — Campaign Organisation
Agency-native data model: Clients hold brand profiles + visual guidelines + voice rules; Campaigns roll up Phases; Phases roll up Assets. Multi-tenant, multi-seat, role-aware.
02
Layer 2 — Specialised Studios
Copy, image, video, music, voice, 3D and deck workflows have source interfaces and routing paths. Development mocks remain explicit; a studio is not proof of a live provider.
03
Layer 3 — CreativeRouter
Routes tasks through configured provider adapters and carries project and brand context between workflow steps. Catalogue entries do not prove provider availability or output quality.
Seven specialised studios
Each studio is designed for a specific medium
Generic AI playgrounds force creatives to fight the UI before they fight the work. The Techne source represents purpose-built studios per medium, each with the right inspector, the right prompts, the right export targets. Brand Memory threads through all of them.
Repository surface only: availability, completeness, performance, and operational fitness require separate validation.
STUDIO
Copy Studio
01
Represents long-form posts, taglines, ad copy, email sequences, and SEO briefs, with a brand-voice profile, versioning, side-by-side comparison, and tone shifting (formal ↔ punchy). Output quality is not asserted.
STUDIO
Image Studio
02
Represents hero images, social cards, paid-creative variants, and in-app illustrations, with style references tied to brand visual guidelines and multi-aspect output for omnichannel campaigns.
STUDIO
Video Studio
03
The video studio is connected to gateway endpoints with explicit mock fallbacks. Provider availability, licensing and output quality depend on the configured path and separate evaluation.
STUDIO
Music Studio
04
Music studio routing and mock fallback are represented in source. Check the configured provider, licensing and output quality for the intended use.
STUDIO
Voice Studio
05
Voice studio routing and mock fallback are represented in source. Voice rights, provider configuration and output quality require separate review.
STUDIO
3D Studio
06
The 3D studio connects to gateway endpoints with mock fallback. Provider availability and usable asset quality are not established by routing code alone.
BUILDER
Deck Builder
07
Represents an outline → slides → pitch flow that draws visuals from Image Studio, copy from Copy Studio, and charts from supplied data, with a deck template tied to the client's brand. PPTX export is represented in source.
Tech Stack
Built With
Named technologies identify repository dependencies or adapter surfaces; they do not assert a live integration or deployment.
Fastify 5, streaming responses, cost tracking, model routing, rate limiting
Provider catalogue in source
The separate Techne repository lists text, image, video, audio, and 3D provider adapters and development mocks. Listing is not evidence of live access, licensing, residency, output quality, or an active integration with this website.