Skip to content

Creative workflow experiment

Techne AI Studio

A multi-surface creative workflow prototype

A multi-surface creative-workflow prototype with web, API, gateway, worker, mobile, and document-add-in packages. The repository shows routing and workflow structure; provider availability and output quality are configuration-dependent.

Business ↔ technology bridge · Creative workflow experiment

Keep commercial and brand intent attached to generated assets.

Explores persistent brand context and provider-neutral orchestration across creative workflows.

This is a portfolio and source interpretation—not a customer, deployment, certification, or outcome claim.

  1. 01

    Business pressure

    Creative teams move between provider tools while project context, brand constraints, approvals, licensing, and asset lineage fragment.

  2. 02

    Product decision

    Keep client, campaign, and brand context outside individual model requests and separate the user workflow from provider routing and background work.

  3. 03

    Technical record

    Web, API, gateway, worker, mobile, presentation-add-in, project-context, provider-adapter, export, and selected test surfaces.

  4. 04

    Evidence return

    Provider availability, asset quality, cost, licensing, and reviewer decisions return to workflow, model choice, and campaign governance.

Source evidence

What the source actually establishes

A multi-surface creative-workflow prototype with web, API, gateway, worker, mobile, and document-add-in packages. The repository shows routing and workflow structure; provider availability and output quality are configuration-dependent.

Maturity
Development prototype
Evidence review
Source snapshot through

Architecture and product decisions

  • Keep project and brand context outside individual generation requests so it can be reused across assets.
  • Separate the user experience, API, model gateway, and background work queues.
  • Fall back to explicit mock providers during development when live provider credentials are absent.

Inspectable evidence

  • A workspace manifest covering web, API, AI gateway, workers, mobile, and presentation-add-in surfaces.
  • Provider-routing and campaign-context source boundaries.
  • Selected API, component, and browser-flow tests plus architecture and container documentation.

Claim boundary

  • A provider or model listed in configuration is not evidence that every adapter is live or commercially available.
  • No comparative output-quality, latency, cost-saving, or customer-use result is asserted.
  • Export and generation paths still require provider, licensing, safety, and quality review per use case.

Repository evidence is not client, deployment, certification, or outcome evidence.

Architecture

Project context, specialist workflows, configurable routing

Three source boundaries: campaign organisation, medium-specific workflow surfaces, and a CreativeRouter abstraction over operator-configured provider adapters.

Source map only: a layer can represent implemented code, an adapter boundary, or documented design. It does not assert a configured production service.

  1. 01

    Layer 1 — Campaign Organisation

    Agency-native data model: Clients hold brand profiles + visual guidelines + voice rules; Campaigns roll up Phases; Phases roll up Assets. Multi-tenant, multi-seat, role-aware.

  2. 02

    Layer 2 — Specialised Studios

    The source represents Copy, Image, Video, Music, Voice, 3D and the Deck Builder. The proposed inspectors, prompt templates and export targets vary by medium (PPTX, DOCX, video files, asset packages).

  3. 03

    Layer 3 — CreativeRouter

    Routes tasks through configured provider adapters and carries project and brand context between workflow steps. Catalogue entries do not prove provider availability or output quality.

The Problem

The Problem

Why creative AI is fragmented

  1. Scattered Tools

    Agencies juggle Midjourney, Runway, ElevenLabs, Suno, and dozens more — each with its own interface and pricing.

  2. No Brand Consistency

    Every tool starts from scratch. No persistent brand voice, visual guidelines, or campaign history across platforms.

  3. Manual Orchestration

    Choosing the right AI model for each task requires expertise. Creative teams waste time on tool selection, not creation.

  4. Siloed Workflows

    Copy, image, video, and audio live in separate tools. No unified project view, no cross-asset intelligence.

Features

Key Features

Source surfaces for coordinating creative AI workflows

Source scope only: an entry can describe implemented code, a documented adapter, or a configured workflow. It is not a statement that a production service is active.

  1. 01

    CreativeRouter

    A routing abstraction selects among configured model adapters using task metadata. Selection quality and provider availability require separate evaluation.

  2. 02

    Brand Memory

    Persistent client profiles storing brand voice, visual guidelines, colour palettes, and full campaign history.

  3. 03

    Campaign Projects

    Hierarchical organisation: Clients > Campaigns > Phases > Assets. Full creative workflow management.

  4. 04

    Seven Specialised Studios

    Dedicated workspaces for Copy, Image, Video, Music, Voice, 3D, and the Deck Builder (PPTX-native), each designed for its medium, plus Social Media Optimiser, Document Generator (DOCX), and Utilities surfaces.

  5. 05

    Export Workflows

    Source paths represent PPTX, DOCX, media, and asset-package exports. Generated files still require licensing, quality, and brand review.

  6. 06

    Provider Catalogue

    The separate venture repository contains provider and model catalogue entries plus explicit development mocks. Catalogue presence does not prove that an adapter is live, licensed, regionally available, or quality-validated.

Seven specialised studios

Each studio is designed for a specific medium

Generic AI playgrounds force creatives to fight the UI before they fight the work. The Techne source represents purpose-built studios per medium, each with the right inspector, the right prompts, the right export targets. Brand Memory threads through all of them.

Repository surface only: availability, completeness, performance, and operational fitness require separate validation.

STUDIO

Copy Studio

01

Represents long-form posts, taglines, ad copy, email sequences, and SEO briefs, with a brand-voice profile, versioning, side-by-side comparison, and tone shifting (formal ↔ punchy). Output quality is not asserted.

STUDIO

Image Studio

02

Represents hero images, social cards, paid-creative variants, and in-app illustrations, with style references tied to brand visual guidelines and multi-aspect output for omnichannel campaigns.

STUDIO

Video Studio

03

Proposed video workflow: Shorts, vertical ads, explainers, brand films. Storyboard → shot list → renders → cut. Voice + music tracks are designed to coordinate via the brand profile.

STUDIO

Music Studio

04

Represents soundtrack, jingle, audio-logo, ambience, and export controls in the workflow. Provider licensing and royalty status must be verified outside the generated output.

STUDIO

Voice Studio

05

Represents narration, character voices, and multilingual voice-over, with a per-brand voice library, SSML controls for pacing, emphasis, and intonation, and side-by-side multilingual rendering.

STUDIO

3D Studio

06

Represents hero assets, product mockups, and environment shots through text-to-3D and image-to-3D paths with brand-locked materials and lighting.

BUILDER

Deck Builder

07

Represents an outline → slides → pitch flow that draws visuals from Image Studio, copy from Copy Studio, and charts from supplied data, with a deck template tied to the client's brand. PPTX export is represented in source.

Tech Stack

Built With

Named technologies identify repository dependencies or adapter surfaces; they do not assert a live integration or deployment.

Frontend
Next.js 15, React, Tailwind CSS 4, Radix UI, Framer Motion, TanStack Query
API Core
Fastify 5, Lucia Auth, PostgreSQL 16, Drizzle ORM, TypeScript strict
AI Gateway
Fastify 5, streaming responses, cost tracking, model routing, rate limiting
Provider catalogue in source
The separate Techne repository lists text, image, video, audio, and 3D provider adapters and development mocks. Listing is not evidence of live access, licensing, residency, output quality, or an active integration with this website.
Infrastructure
Turborepo monorepo, pnpm workspaces, Docker, Redis 7, BullMQ workers
Monitoring
Prometheus, Grafana, structured logging, cost dashboards

Source Code

Explore the Code

The Techne AI Studio prototype — monorepo with web, API, AI gateway, and workers — is available upon request.

NDA Required

To access the source code, please sign the Non-Disclosure Agreement. This is a standard legal formality.

Related Consulting Services

Need help building production AI systems or deploying intelligent agents? Explore the related consulting services.

Partnership

Interested in Techne AI Studio?

This prototype is for creative agencies, brand studios, and AI partners looking to unify creative workflows.

Get in Touch
AI Insights

The AI Dispatch

From demo to dependable operation. Subscribe for new Physical AI reading.

Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.

Techne AI Studio — Creative Workflow Prototype