Decision Lab · current proof and applied research
Run the fictional product flight simulator, inspect Auralink, Reachy and bench evidence, and use methods that turn observations into product decisions. The planned physical Foundry has its own clearly labelled reference.
Current Decision Lab index — evidence remains classified by maturity, source and limitation.
Digital lab live · physical Foundry planned
The product flight simulator and Hyperion-authored research artefacts are available now. The six model-backed exhibits are switched off until each has the same controls as the Product Council. The proposed physical facility, zones and missions remain illustrative until built, tested and labelled otherwise.
Available now
The simulator is the Lab’s only runnable product experiment. Its scenario and outputs are fictional, illustrative and experiment-only.
Fictional · illustrative · experiment-only
Configure a fictional AMR, drone, cobot or vehicle-feature product. Stress economics, reliability, completeness, recovery and operator burden; inspect the diagnostic gaps; then export Product Decision, Product Bridge and Product System records with provenance. All outputs remain illustrative and experiment-only.
Owned research
Each record states what was examined and what the evidence does and does not establish.
Auralink
Reachy Mini + SO-101
Current status
The current field-note revision is awaiting editorial review. Its link and dependent performance figures are withheld; no throughput or product-readiness conclusion is offered.
Methods and tools
Open the method that fits the decision. Each route states its evidence and authority boundary.
Five lifecycle gates and six evidence lenses for one accountable product decision.
Frame compute, latency, power, integration and lifecycle trade-offs before choosing hardware.
A self-reported signal across architecture, data, integration, reliability and governance—not a certification.
Inspect curated robot apps, datasets, policies and agents from the open ecosystem.
HC-OPDG-001 · v0.1.0 released
Inspect verified fictional golden reports for changed evidence, assumptions, Release Cases and specialist conflicts. The viewer displays the pinned result; it does not recompute impact in the browser.
Planned · illustrative · no results collected
Six planned stages define required records and metric denominators. The reference has no collected results.
Go deeper
Follow the research projects behind the work, or explore the proposed physical lab.
Inspect the full set of Hyperion research ventures, their maturity labels and their source material.
Open the archivePlanned · illustrative until commissioned
Explore the proposed stations, missions and evidence approach for a future physical lab.
Open the planned FoundryThese routes remain available for continuity, but the exhibits are inactive and are not current proof. They stay switched off until they meet the same control standard as the Product Council.
One-image automation and safety observations; not a site audit, engineering assessment or certification.
A model describes what an industrial inspection layer might flag; not a validated defect detector or production-quality measurement.
Source-grounded general information about the EU AI Act; not legal advice or a conformity assessment.
A self-assessment across data, sensors, connectivity, ML readiness and governance; not an audit of your systems or a validated maturity benchmark.
A first-pass payback period and 3-year range from six inputs; not a quotation, a vendor recommendation or an engineering estimate.
A model reads a sensor CSV and drafts plausible anomalies and a schedule; not a trained maintenance model or a basis for maintenance decisions.
Bring one stuck initiative
In a 30-minute fit call, Mohammed will identify the decision, the missing evidence and whether one of Hyperion’s three mandates is appropriate—or say plainly that it is not.
30 minutes · no obligation · Mohammed leads every conversation